Proposal Figures
Grant and research graphics reviewers can read at a glance
Proposal figures do a specific job under specific pressure. A reviewer is working through a stack of applications, and your figure gets a few seconds to establish what you are proposing and why it is worth funding. If it takes longer than that to parse, it has cost you rather than helped.
I spent 19 years at Purdue producing this work for NSF, DOE, DOD, and NIH submissions, alongside center-level proposals with 10 or more collaborating investigators. That means the constraints are already familiar: single-column widths, grayscale-safe palettes, type that survives at 8pt, and the reality that the figure gets finished three days before the deadline while the narrative is still moving.
The work here includes conceptual overviews, workflow and process diagrams, experimental schematics, data visualizations, and the summary figure that has to carry an entire aims page. Everything is delivered as vector art that scales without degrading, with an editable master file, so the next submission is a revision rather than a rebuild.























